Things that DON'T turn me on:
fat chicks
Bound guys
extreme tattoos
extreme piercings
too much costume/fetish gear
anything gay male..eeeewwwwwwww.
Things that don't turn you on
-
MistyQ
- Member
- Posts: 6
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Things that DON'T turn me on:
1. Anything that consists or implies snuff is a definite turn off.
2. Mutilation and bloodbaths including sticking things into nipples and clits or cutting said bits off. I don’t mind nipple rings and in fact they are quite hot as are clit rings. But I don’t like them being torn off the victim and the victim’s beauty being destroyed as a result.
3. Pain for the sake of pain/overboard brutality – I’d rather watch a gory horror than see that in an erotic comic
4. Burning of victims is a turn off though I am open to branding. Also sticking anything heated in a victim is a turn off – e.g. heated metal rods, hot water, etc.
5. Victims who get turned on and end up cumming UNLESS it was done purely to humiliate her- I find forced orgasm hot.
6. Anything to do with piss, shit and vomit is a turn off.
7. Ass to mouth is a turn off.
8. Lesbian sex does nothing for me but I often rp such scenes for the pleasure of my roleplay partners, so I can tolerate it.
9. Fat ugly women don’t do much for me – I’d rather it be a fat ugly man doing the tormenting
10. Bound men does little for me but I suppose it fits with the type of story where the male who cares for the victim can’t help her
11. Lack of realism – for example, if the victim is a virgin, then a little blood would be expected on her first time. A little, not a river.
12. Having a male captive’s dick chomped off by a female captive - Eww...
Other turn offs such as birthing and bestiality have not been an issue since the comics rarely have such things. For the former, I find the prospect of a victim being rendered pregnant by the rapes quite hot but my fantasies rarely go to the stage where she is about to pop. Seen some of those in hentai and I was rather traumatised. In terms of bestiality, I am more against male-human on any animal rather than female human being forced to take animals. Monsters are A-okay as are tentacles.
What can I say? I am picky
1. Anything that consists or implies snuff is a definite turn off.
2. Mutilation and bloodbaths including sticking things into nipples and clits or cutting said bits off. I don’t mind nipple rings and in fact they are quite hot as are clit rings. But I don’t like them being torn off the victim and the victim’s beauty being destroyed as a result.
3. Pain for the sake of pain/overboard brutality – I’d rather watch a gory horror than see that in an erotic comic
4. Burning of victims is a turn off though I am open to branding. Also sticking anything heated in a victim is a turn off – e.g. heated metal rods, hot water, etc.
5. Victims who get turned on and end up cumming UNLESS it was done purely to humiliate her- I find forced orgasm hot.
6. Anything to do with piss, shit and vomit is a turn off.
7. Ass to mouth is a turn off.
8. Lesbian sex does nothing for me but I often rp such scenes for the pleasure of my roleplay partners, so I can tolerate it.
9. Fat ugly women don’t do much for me – I’d rather it be a fat ugly man doing the tormenting
10. Bound men does little for me but I suppose it fits with the type of story where the male who cares for the victim can’t help her
11. Lack of realism – for example, if the victim is a virgin, then a little blood would be expected on her first time. A little, not a river.
12. Having a male captive’s dick chomped off by a female captive - Eww...
Other turn offs such as birthing and bestiality have not been an issue since the comics rarely have such things. For the former, I find the prospect of a victim being rendered pregnant by the rapes quite hot but my fantasies rarely go to the stage where she is about to pop. Seen some of those in hentai and I was rather traumatised. In terms of bestiality, I am more against male-human on any animal rather than female human being forced to take animals. Monsters are A-okay as are tentacles.
What can I say? I am picky
-
ROBERTS
- Member
- Posts: 730
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Well don't worry...the banks imposing the current censorship on behalf of the US Justice Department are more picky than you are. They consider any monster sex or tentacles as bestiality, blood anywhere is forbidden, any animals are an instant no no, any cutting or gory blood and guts are straight out, in most cases any weapon shown threatening a bound female is out. Violation of these will get a website shut down. Out of business. bankrupt. So don't worry, not very likely any of us are going to risk being cut off from credit card sales and blacklisted just to draw things with such limited erotic appeal.
-
MistyQ
- Member
- Posts: 6
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Monster sex and tentacles being considered as bestiality... oh those poor exploited monsters and tentacles 
Kind of dashes every girl's dream of owning a tentacle pet.
With regard to the turn offs, I should state that while they turn me off, I would not go around crusading for their demise. There isn't enough research on whether violent comics/movies/games impact on behaviour in the real world.
Kind of dashes every girl's dream of owning a tentacle pet. With regard to the turn offs, I should state that while they turn me off, I would not go around crusading for their demise. There isn't enough research on whether violent comics/movies/games impact on behaviour in the real world.
-
STeve
- Member
- Posts: 120
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Well actually, there is a considerable body of research, going back many years. For the decades that many serious people, and many propagandists, have been looking, assiduously, for a link between porn, BDSM, comics, video games and violent entertainment, not one has found credible evidence to say that entertainment, violent or not, causes criminal behaviour.
Where the "crusaders for protecting our -whatever" get it wrong is that they confuse style with content and correlation for cause. That is, though entertainment has not been shown to cause crime, it has been shown to influence the way some crimes are committed. This is often the "hook" on which the anti-this or that campaigns are hung.
A kid listens to heavy-metal, dresses like his favourite band and quotes the lyrics of their songs as he blows the heads off his classmates, and the cry goes up "It was the music made him do it!".
Or some maniac actually kidnaps and rapes women and has a BDSM collection and the cry goes up "It was the BDSM that made him do it!". We have restrictive laws here in the U.K. based precisely on this argument. In this case the correlation of committing the crime and having the BDSM is enough for the cry to go up. In reality it is cracked logic. I dare say the vast majority of serial killers have fridges, but it wasn't the fridges that made them serial killers, if you get my point.
Easy targets, but red herrings. Going after such things gives politicians and lobby groups a platform on which to pretend that they are protecting society from "evil", whereas all they are really doing is promoting themselves. And it works too.
If you are interested, there was a very surprising study by Milton Diamond et al. of Hawaii university, which studied the influence of violent and sexual Manga on Japanese youth. The conclusion of the study was that the more such material became available, the lower the sex crime stats became. Similar studies show similar correlations between the spread of the internet state by state in the U.S. where greater access went hand in hand with lower sex crimes. Not proof of a causal relationship at all, but it certainly undermines the argument that porn encourages sex crimes.
Where the "crusaders for protecting our -whatever" get it wrong is that they confuse style with content and correlation for cause. That is, though entertainment has not been shown to cause crime, it has been shown to influence the way some crimes are committed. This is often the "hook" on which the anti-this or that campaigns are hung.
A kid listens to heavy-metal, dresses like his favourite band and quotes the lyrics of their songs as he blows the heads off his classmates, and the cry goes up "It was the music made him do it!".
Or some maniac actually kidnaps and rapes women and has a BDSM collection and the cry goes up "It was the BDSM that made him do it!". We have restrictive laws here in the U.K. based precisely on this argument. In this case the correlation of committing the crime and having the BDSM is enough for the cry to go up. In reality it is cracked logic. I dare say the vast majority of serial killers have fridges, but it wasn't the fridges that made them serial killers, if you get my point.
Easy targets, but red herrings. Going after such things gives politicians and lobby groups a platform on which to pretend that they are protecting society from "evil", whereas all they are really doing is promoting themselves. And it works too.
If you are interested, there was a very surprising study by Milton Diamond et al. of Hawaii university, which studied the influence of violent and sexual Manga on Japanese youth. The conclusion of the study was that the more such material became available, the lower the sex crime stats became. Similar studies show similar correlations between the spread of the internet state by state in the U.S. where greater access went hand in hand with lower sex crimes. Not proof of a causal relationship at all, but it certainly undermines the argument that porn encourages sex crimes.
-
ROBERTS
- Member
- Posts: 730
Re: Things that don't turn you on
What the US did had nothing to do with any high minded social good, it was repayment of a debt owed by George W. Bush to the huge number of Christian lunatics we have in the US who voted for him under the promise he would go after pornography with merciless prosecutions. unfortunately they lost every court case they brought, even once more losing their ass and millions of dollars in the John Stagliano case...after which Obama fired the whole porn unit of the Justice Department.
Bush's people came up with the perfect weapon. the Constitution protects porn in court, so don't go after it in the courts, privatize the censorship. Private corporations do not have to follow Constitutional rights. So the Banks processing the credit cards were chosen as the weapon. Porn is censored by the bankers who process your credit cards when you join a site or buy online. Violate their censorship and no more money, and your favorite website disappears.
Bush's people came up with the perfect weapon. the Constitution protects porn in court, so don't go after it in the courts, privatize the censorship. Private corporations do not have to follow Constitutional rights. So the Banks processing the credit cards were chosen as the weapon. Porn is censored by the bankers who process your credit cards when you join a site or buy online. Violate their censorship and no more money, and your favorite website disappears.
-
ernestgreene
- Member
- Posts: 275
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Obviously I agree. What little scientific evidence we have (this is not a popular research topic in the academic world and hard to get funded) from good sources like UCLA's Dr. Neil Malmuth and Anthony D'Amato at Northwestern suggest that here is a negative or neutral correlation between the availability of porn overall and sexual violence, but that is, of course, science. You can hardly expect Holy Joes who reject Darwin to listen to these guys.
The outsourcing of censorship to private companies was a a stroke of evil genius. It ducks The First Amendment issue by taking law enforcement out of the picture and relies on the essentially conservative and highly stock-holder sensitive to decide what we see and hear.
This isn't the only instance of it happening either. Threats of conservative consumer boycotts against advertisers or pressure from network affiliates in conservative parts of this country have resulted in many controversial film and television projects see their green lights turn red. And unlike in a court of law, there is no appeal. Businesses have an unchallenged right to make or not make just about any kind of entertainment product they choose and sell it or not sell it any way they like.
I give credit to Obama for dissolving the Justice Department's time and money wasting Adult Obscenity Prosecutions Unit and sending that dope Brett Ward back to Utah (Bill Clinton did the same thing with Meese's gang when he came in) but I don't see any successful challenge in civil court to privately imposed censorship getting anywhere. In a way, that would be inconsistent with The First Amendment as well, in that there is no legal way to compel any producer or distributor to create or sell any material regardless of content.
So far, there is no solution to this problem and I see none on the horizon.
The outsourcing of censorship to private companies was a a stroke of evil genius. It ducks The First Amendment issue by taking law enforcement out of the picture and relies on the essentially conservative and highly stock-holder sensitive to decide what we see and hear.
This isn't the only instance of it happening either. Threats of conservative consumer boycotts against advertisers or pressure from network affiliates in conservative parts of this country have resulted in many controversial film and television projects see their green lights turn red. And unlike in a court of law, there is no appeal. Businesses have an unchallenged right to make or not make just about any kind of entertainment product they choose and sell it or not sell it any way they like.
I give credit to Obama for dissolving the Justice Department's time and money wasting Adult Obscenity Prosecutions Unit and sending that dope Brett Ward back to Utah (Bill Clinton did the same thing with Meese's gang when he came in) but I don't see any successful challenge in civil court to privately imposed censorship getting anywhere. In a way, that would be inconsistent with The First Amendment as well, in that there is no legal way to compel any producer or distributor to create or sell any material regardless of content.
So far, there is no solution to this problem and I see none on the horizon.
-
OnlyInMyImagination
- Member
- Posts: 124
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Things that DO NOT turn me on:
1. Mutilation of any form
2. Excessive physical harm
3. Blood
4. Excrement and other organic waste
5. Monsters getting it on with human women
6. t@rture
7. Anything that I cannot imagine myself doing to a fantasy girl
1. Mutilation of any form
2. Excessive physical harm
3. Blood
4. Excrement and other organic waste
5. Monsters getting it on with human women
6. t@rture
7. Anything that I cannot imagine myself doing to a fantasy girl
-
Demosthenes
- Member
- Posts: 507
Re: Things that don't turn you on
I'd also like to add that I don't like scenarios where the toons perish. Whether it is shown or just implied. It's just too nihilistic and grim for my tastes. However terrible their predicament, there should always be at least some tiny glimmer of hope of escape for them.
-
ernestgreene
- Member
- Posts: 275
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Things that don't turn you on
Agreed. The last thing I want from even a dark sex comic is to be left feeling depressed.